<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed is of the Essence, but Relevency is still the King of the 200 (more common sense from Google)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markattwood.com/internetmarketing/speed-is-of-the-essence-but-relevency-is-still-the-king-of-the-200-more-common-sense-from-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markattwood.com/internetmarketing/speed-is-of-the-essence-but-relevency-is-still-the-king-of-the-200-more-common-sense-from-google/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing &#38; SEO for Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synergy Connections Telemarketing</title>
		<link>http://www.markattwood.com/internetmarketing/speed-is-of-the-essence-but-relevency-is-still-the-king-of-the-200-more-common-sense-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Synergy Connections Telemarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markattwood.com/?p=918#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how much &#039;weight&#039; Google are placing on site speed?  Obviously, doing things with re-using CSS, cutting image sizes, and similar will speed up  a site, but the ultimate limit is your hosts connection.

It can be hard to change host, but I keep getting adverts from a company saying they are the fastest response time hots in the UK, and it makes me think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how much &#8216;weight&#8217; Google are placing on site speed?  Obviously, doing things with re-using CSS, cutting image sizes, and similar will speed up  a site, but the ultimate limit is your hosts connection.</p>
<p>It can be hard to change host, but I keep getting adverts from a company saying they are the fastest response time hots in the UK, and it makes me think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baby Kimono</title>
		<link>http://www.markattwood.com/internetmarketing/speed-is-of-the-essence-but-relevency-is-still-the-king-of-the-200-more-common-sense-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Baby Kimono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markattwood.com/?p=918#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>This is why I visit your blog - to cut out the bs around SEO. Thanks for postin this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I visit your blog &#8211; to cut out the bs around SEO. Thanks for postin this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
